<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<review>
<!--
 DATA PROCESSING TIPS AND TRICKS REVIEWER'S REPORT FORM
 ======================================================

 Please,
   - Replace " ... " between the appropriate tags with your text.
   - Do not remove or change any tags!
   - Do not use "&", "<" or ">" in what you type,
     rather use "&amp;", "&lt;" and "&gt;"!

 After filling out the form, return it by email to lintu@mpii.de
 before the deadline.

*** INSTRUCTIONS ****

Before writing your reviews, study first ALL web presentations, then
concentrate on each topic separately and read again those web sites
concerning the SAME topic. Fill out one review form for each web
presentation. Remember that your review is supposed to give the author
constructive feedback on how to improve his or her explanation.  

Note that this is a blind review process; this means all your comments
will be sent to the person who's work you reviewed, EXCEPT your name
and email. 
-->

<!-- ============================================================
 Insert the author's name and the topic (plese copy both EXACTLY as on
the topic's wiki page) 
-->
AUTHOR <au> ... </au>
TOPIC  <ti> ... </ti>

<!-- ============================================================
 Please summarize the algorithm described on this web site in 1 - 2
paragraphs. 
-->
SUMMARY
<summary>
 ... 
</summary>

<!-- ============================================================
 What is this algorithm good for ? 
-->
USE
<use>
 ... 
</use>

<!-- ============================================================
What did you especially like about this explanation ?
-->
LIKE
<like>
 ... 
</like>

<!-- ============================================================
What did you dislike/not understand ? 
-->
DISLIKE
<dislike>
 ... 
</dislike>

<!-- ============================================================
How can this explanation be improved ? 
-->
IMPROVEMENT
<improvement>
 ... 
</improvement>

<!-- ============================================================
OVERALL RATING

In this rating please take also in consideration the quality of the
presentation compared to other presentations on the SAME(!) topic.

Please rate the submission using one of the following integer values:

  1 = very poor,
  2 = not quite acceptable,
  3 = acceptable,
  4 = good,
  5 = excellent,
-->
RATING
<rating> ... </rating>

<!-- ============================================================
 Insert your name and email (plese copy your name EXACTLY as on
your topic's wiki page) 
-->
REVIEWER'S NAME           <name>  ... </name>
REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS  <email> ... </email>

</review>






