b'@inproceedings{mehlhorn06,'b'\nTITLE = {Reply to "Backward Error Analysis ..."},\nAUTHOR = {Kettner, Lutz and Mehlhorn, Kurt and Pion, Sylvain and Schirra, Stefan and Yap, Chee},\nEDITOR = {Gavrilova, Marina and Gervasi, Osvaldo and Kumar, Vipin and Tan, C. J.Kenneth and Taniar, David and Lagan{\\`a}, Antonio and Mun, Youngsong and Choo, Hyunseung},\nLANGUAGE = {eng},\nISBN = {3-540-34070-X},\nLOCALID = {Local-ID: C1256428004B93B8-47155FF99A36D907C12571F1002C58B0-mehlhorn06},\nPUBLISHER = {Springer},\nYEAR = {2006},\nDATE = {2006},\nABSTRACT = {The algorithms of computational geometry are designed for a machine model with exact real arithmetic. Substituting floating-point arithmetic for the assumed real arithmetic may cause implementations to fail. Although this is well known, it is not common knowledge. There is no paper that systematically discusses what can go wrong and provides simple examples for the di.erent ways in which floating-point implementations can fail. Due to this lack of examples, instructors of computational geometry have little material for demonstrating the inadequacy of floating-point arithmetic for geometric computations, students of computational geometry and implementers of geometric algorithms still underestimate the seriousness of the problem, and researchers in our and neighboring disciplines still believe that simple approaches are able to overcome the problem. In this paper, we study simple algorithms for two simple geometric problems, namely computing convex hulls and triangulations of point sets, and show how they can fail and explain why they fail when executed with floating-point arithmetic.},\nBOOKTITLE = {Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2006, I},\nPAGES = {60--60},\nSERIES = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},\nVOLUME = {3980},\n}\n'