@online{Kisfaludi-BakNW20,
TITLE = {A Gap-{ETH}-Tight Approximation Scheme for Euclidean {TSP}},
AUTHOR = {Kisfaludi-Bak, S{\'a}ndor and Nederlof, Jesper and W{\k e}grzycki, Karol},
LANGUAGE = {eng},
URL = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03778},
EPRINT = {2011.03778},
EPRINTTYPE = {arXiv},
YEAR = {2020},
ABSTRACT = {We revisit the classic task of finding the shortest tour of $n$ points in<br>$d$-dimensional Euclidean space, for any fixed constant $d \geq 2$. We<br>determine the optimal dependence on $\varepsilon$ in the running time of an<br>algorithm that computes a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate tour, under a plausible<br>assumption. Specifically, we give an algorithm that runs in<br>$2^{\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})} n\log n$ time. This improves the<br>previously smallest dependence on $\varepsilon$ in the running time<br>$(1/\varepsilon)^{\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})}n \log n$ of the algorithm<br>by Rao and Smith (STOC 1998). We also show that a<br>$2^{o(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})}\text{poly}(n)$ algorithm would violate the<br>Gap-Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH).<br> Our new algorithm builds upon the celebrated quadtree-based methods initially<br>proposed by Arora (J. ACM 1998), but it adds a simple new idea that we call<br>\emph{sparsity-sensitive patching}. On a high level this lets the granularity<br>with which we simplify the tour depend on how sparse it is locally. Our<br>approach is (arguably) simpler than the one by Rao and Smith since it can work<br>without geometric spanners. We demonstrate the technique extends easily to<br>other problems, by showing as an example that it also yields a Gap-ETH-tight<br>approximation scheme for Rectilinear Steiner Tree.<br>},
}
