@online{Bringmann_2107.07625,
TITLE = {Deterministic and {Las Vegas} Algorithms for Sparse Nonnegative Convolution},
AUTHOR = {Bringmann, Karl and Fischer, Nick and Nakos, Vasileios},
LANGUAGE = {eng},
URL = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07625},
EPRINT = {2107.07625},
EPRINTTYPE = {arXiv},
YEAR = {2021},
MARGINALMARK = {$\bullet$},
ABSTRACT = {Computing the convolution $A\star B$ of two length-$n$ integer vectors $A,B$ is a core problem in several disciplines. It frequently comes up in algorithms for Knapsack, $k$-SUM, All-Pairs Shortest Paths, and string pattern matching problems. For these applications it typically suffices to compute convolutions of nonnegative vectors. This problem can be classically solved in time $O(n\log n)$ using the Fast Fourier Transform. However, often the involved vectors are sparse and hence one could hope for output-sensitive algorithms to compute nonnegative convolutions. This question was raised by Muthukrishnan and solved by Cole and Hariharan (STOC '02) by a randomized algorithm running in near-linear time in the (unknown) output-size $t$. Chan and Lewenstein (STOC '15) presented a deterministic algorithm with a $2^{O(\sqrt{\log t\cdot\log\log n})}$ overhead in running time and the additional assumption that a small superset of the output is given; this assumption was later removed by Bringmann and Nakos (ICALP '21). In this paper we present the first deterministic near-linear-time algorithm for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. This immediately gives improved deterministic algorithms for the state-of-the-art of output-sensitive Subset Sum, block-mass pattern matching, $N$-fold Boolean convolution, and others, matching up to log-factors the fastest known randomized algorithms for these problems. Our algorithm is a blend of algebraic and combinatorial ideas and techniques. Additionally, we provide two fast Las Vegas algorithms for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. In particular, we present a simple $O(t\log^2t)$ time algorithm, which is an accessible alternative to Cole and Hariharan's algorithm. We further refine this new algorithm to run in Las Vegas time $O(t\log t\cdot\log\log t)$, matching the running time of the dense case apart from the $\log\log t$ factor.},
}