Jovita Lukasik

Vision language models (VLMs) have drastically changed the computer vision
model landscape in only a few years, opening an exciting array of new
applications from zero-shot image classification, over to image captioning, and
visual question answering. Unlike pure vision models, they offer an intuitive
way to access visual content through language prompting. The wide applicability
of such models encourages us to ask whether they also align with human vision -
specifically, how far they adopt human-induced visual biases through multimodal
fusion, or whether they simply inherit biases from pure vision models. One
important visual bias is the texture vs. shape bias, or the dominance of local
over global information. In this paper, we study this bias in a wide range of
popular VLMs. Interestingly, we find that VLMs are often more shape-biased than
their vision encoders, indicating that visual biases are modulated to some
extent through text in multimodal models. If text does indeed influence visual
biases, this suggests that we may be able to steer visual biases not just
through visual input but also through language: a hypothesis that we confirm
through extensive experiments. For instance, we are able to steer shape bias
from as low as 49% to as high as 72% through prompting alone. For now, the
strong human bias towards shape (96%) remains out of reach for all tested VLMs.

Deep learning models have proven to be successful in a wide
range of machine learning tasks. Yet, they are often highly sensitive to
perturbations on the input data which can lead to incorrect decisions
with high confidence, hampering their deployment for practical
use-cases. Thus, finding architectures that are (more) robust against
perturbations has received much attention in recent years. Just like the
search for well-performing architectures in terms of clean accuracy,
this usually involves a tedious trial-and-error process with one
additional challenge: the evaluation of a network's robustness is
significantly more expensive than its evaluation for clean accuracy.
Thus, the aim of this paper is to facilitate better streamlined research
on architectural design choices with respect to their impact on
robustness as well as, for example, the evaluation of surrogate measures
for robustness. We therefore borrow one of the most commonly considered
search spaces for neural architecture search for image classification,
NAS-Bench-201, which contains a manageable size of 6466 non-isomorphic
network designs. We evaluate all these networks on a range of common
adversarial attacks and corruption types and introduce a database on
neural architecture design and robustness evaluations. We further
present three exemplary use cases of this dataset, in which we (i)
benchmark robustness measurements based on Jacobian and Hessian matrices
for their robustness predictability, (ii) perform neural architecture
search on robust accuracies, and (iii) provide an initial analysis of
how architectural design choices affect robustness. We find that
carefully crafting the topology of a network can have substantial impact
on its robustness, where networks with the same parameter count range in
mean adversarial robust accuracy from 20%-41%.